Niccolo Catini vs Tsz Fu Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Sep at 02:39 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Catini vs T. Fu Wong

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

HKG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Catini 1 - 0 Wong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Niccolo Catini winning 2 and Tsz Fu Wong winning 0. The last match between Niccolo Catini and Tsz Fu Wong was at the M15 Hong Kong, 04-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Niccolo Catini getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Catini | 1 |
| Wong | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Hong Kong(09-04-25)
N. Catini vs T. F. Wong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.43% (118-116) | Career Total W/L | 20.00% (5-20) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Catini vs T. F. Wong Match Preview:
- In recent months, Wong has shown stronger second serve performance, securing 43.6% of points compared to Catini’s 39.22%. Will this give Wong an edge in their serve games? Quite likely, yes.
- Wong is also slightly ahead in returning opponent's second serves, winning 49.21% of these points, while Catini wins 46.95%.
- However, Catini performs better when returning first serves, with a success rate of 29.73% against Wong’s 26.12%.
- Under pressure, Wong has saved 58.14% of breakpoints, whereas Catini has managed to save only 48.5%.
- Over the past year, Catini has compiled a stronger match record, winning 50% of their matches, whereas Wong has won just 31.25%.
- Wong thrives more on clay, achieving a win rate of 33%, yet performs dismally on hard courts at 15%. Meanwhile, Catini excels on hard courts with a 55% win rate.
- When considering tournament levels, Wong and Catini compete predominantly at the $10K level, with Catini holding a slight edge in win percentage.
- Interestingly, Wong has faced higher-ranked opponents on average, with a mean opponent rank of 262.38 compared to Catini’s 437.38. Could this experience against tougher competitors benefit Wong?
- Catini has a clear advantage in deciding set scenarios, boasting a win rate of 62% compared to Wong’s 33%.
- Wong demonstrates stronger breakpoint conversion at 42.86%, compared to Catini’s 34.39%, a crucial stat for breaking serve in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (September 4, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the upcoming matchup, Wong holds an advantage in recent second serve performance and has been more successful at breaking serve through better conversion rates. These aspects could be pivotal.
However, Catini has demonstrated resilience in deciding sets, a factor that may play a key role should the match extend to a third set. Their solid performance on hard courts further underscores their strength on this surface.
Despite Wong's experience against higher-ranked opponents, Catini's overall match record and success in deciding sets suggest a steadier level of recent form.
Taking all statistics into account, Catini seems poised to be the likely victor in the upcoming match, leveraging their strengths in crucial scenarios and surface preference. Therefore, Catini is favored to win this encounter.
Niccolo Catini vs Tsz Fu Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Catini vs T. F. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:42:39 | Average Match Time | 2:42:39 |
| 60% (43/72) | 1st Serve % | 78% (62/80) |
| 65% (28/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (34/62) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 48% (38/80) | Return Points Win % | 40% (29/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Catini Recent Matches Played
T. F. Wong Recent Matches Played

N. Catini vs T. F. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.43% (118/116) | YTD Win/Loss | 20.00% (5/20) |
| 50.66% (268/261) | Sets Win/Loss | 28.81% (17/42) |
| 51.53% (2525/2375) | Games Win/Loss | 42.01% (247/341) |
| 56.82% (25/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 13.33% (2/13) |
| 48.86% (86/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 258 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 386 | Total Double Faults | 70 |
| 1:22:52 | Average Match Time | 1:17:48 |
| 383.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 289.84 |
| 68% (7990/11797) | 1st Serve % | 64% (725/1130) |
| 61% (4880/7990) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (421/725) |
| 47% (1799/3807) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (184/405) |
| 45% (607/1342) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (30/76) |
| 43% (5060/11781) | Return Points Win % | 35% (357/1007) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.30% (118/112) | Futures W/L | 20.83% (5/19) |
| 50% (115/229) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (5/25) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (14/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 47% (29/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 22% (2/9) |
| 84% (128/107) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 63% (8/5) |
| 16% (128/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 38% (8/3) |
| 9% (106/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (17/0) |